imtoken Knowledge Center
Network Guides｜imtoken
Learn network selection, EVM, Layer 2, gas and cross-layer confirmations through task-focused guides.
On this page
Choose the correct network
To understand Network Guides, place choose the correct network inside the full on-chain workflow instead of treating it as an isolated label. The practical point is to verify choose the correct network in the context of the selected blockchain network. The user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming. A wallet can organize information and submit requests, but the selected network and the blockchain determine the final state. On-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone. Third-party DApps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review. If the interface does not match your expectation, verify the network, address, contract and on-chain record before taking another action.
A practical way to approach choose the correct network is to use a consistent review sequence. First, the practical point is to verify choose the correct network in the context of the selected blockchain network. Next, the user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming. After a transaction, signature or approval is submitted, on-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone. Finally, third-party dapps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review. This sequence gives each confirmation a clear reason and helps reduce wrong-network transfers, address mismatches, unnecessary permissions and repeated actions caused by a delayed interface.
- The practical point is to verify choose the correct network in the context of the selected blockchain network
- The user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming
- On-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone
- Third-party DApps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review
Understand EVM networks
To understand Network Guides, place understand evm networks inside the full on-chain workflow instead of treating it as an isolated label. The practical point is to verify understand evm networks in the context of the selected blockchain network. The user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming. A wallet can organize information and submit requests, but the selected network and the blockchain determine the final state. On-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone. Third-party DApps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review. If the interface does not match your expectation, verify the network, address, contract and on-chain record before taking another action.
A practical way to approach understand evm networks is to use a consistent review sequence. First, the practical point is to verify understand evm networks in the context of the selected blockchain network. Next, the user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming. After a transaction, signature or approval is submitted, on-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone. Finally, third-party dapps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review. This sequence gives each confirmation a clear reason and helps reduce wrong-network transfers, address mismatches, unnecessary permissions and repeated actions caused by a delayed interface.
- The practical point is to verify understand evm networks in the context of the selected blockchain network
- The user should compare the request with the intended address, asset, account or contract before confirming
- On-chain state and a transaction hash provide stronger evidence than a delayed interface alone
- Third-party DApps, services and smart contracts can introduce risks that need separate review
Use Layer 2 carefully
To understand Network Guides, place use layer 2 carefully inside the full on-chain workflow instead of treating it as an isolated label. Layer 2 networks remain distinct environments even when they settle to a base layer. Moving assets across layers usually requires a bridge rather than a normal transfer. A wallet can organize information and submit requests, but the selected network and the blockchain determine the final state. Withdrawal timing depends on the Layer 2 design and current network state. The recipient must support the destination network. If the interface does not match your expectation, verify the network, address, contract and on-chain record before taking another action.
A practical way to approach use layer 2 carefully is to use a consistent review sequence. First, layer 2 networks remain distinct environments even when they settle to a base layer. Next, moving assets across layers usually requires a bridge rather than a normal transfer. After a transaction, signature or approval is submitted, withdrawal timing depends on the layer 2 design and current network state. Finally, the recipient must support the destination network. This sequence gives each confirmation a clear reason and helps reduce wrong-network transfers, address mismatches, unnecessary permissions and repeated actions caused by a delayed interface.
- Layer 2 networks remain distinct environments even when they settle to a base layer
- Moving assets across layers usually requires a bridge rather than a normal transfer
- Withdrawal timing depends on the Layer 2 design and current network state
- The recipient must support the destination network
Handle gas and confirmations
To understand Network Guides, place handle gas and confirmations inside the full on-chain workflow instead of treating it as an isolated label. Gas pays for network processing or contract execution. Fee estimates and confirmation times change with network conditions. A wallet can organize information and submit requests, but the selected network and the blockchain determine the final state. A transaction hash is the best starting point for checking status. Failed or pending transactions should be distinguished before retrying. If the interface does not match your expectation, verify the network, address, contract and on-chain record before taking another action.
A practical way to approach handle gas and confirmations is to use a consistent review sequence. First, gas pays for network processing or contract execution. Next, fee estimates and confirmation times change with network conditions. After a transaction, signature or approval is submitted, a transaction hash is the best starting point for checking status. Finally, failed or pending transactions should be distinguished before retrying. This sequence gives each confirmation a clear reason and helps reduce wrong-network transfers, address mismatches, unnecessary permissions and repeated actions caused by a delayed interface.
- Gas pays for network processing or contract execution
- Fee estimates and confirmation times change with network conditions
- A transaction hash is the best starting point for checking status
- Failed or pending transactions should be distinguished before retrying